Saturday, June 20, 2009

Game 33

Game 33
Rubinstein - Maroczy
Gothenburg 1920

D63 : Queen's Gambit Declined Orthodox Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:32:20)

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.c4 e6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Nc3 OO 7.Rc1 Re8 8.Qc2 dc 9.Bc4 c5 10.OO cd 11.Nd4 a6 12.Rfd1 Qa5 13.Bh4 Ne5 14.Be2 Ng6 15.Bg3 e5 16.Nb3 Qc7 17.Qb1 Qb8 18.Bf3 Qa7 19.a5 Bb4 20.Nc4 Bd7 21.Nd5 Nd5 22.Bd5 Be6 23.Qe4 Bd5 24.Rd5 Rac8 25.Rcd1 Bf8 26.b3 b5 27.Nd6 Bd6 28.Rd6 Rc7 29.h4 f6 30.Qd5 Kh8 (a blunder. 30...Kf8 keeps it alive) 31.h5 (a serious oversight. 31.Rd8 would have win the game immediately) Nf8 32.h6 Ng6 (32...Qb7 will keep Black still in the game) 33.Qe6 Rf8 34.Rd7 gh 35.Bh4 1-0

Game 32

Game 32
Canal - Capablanca
Budapest 1929

E16 : Queen's Indian Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:23:57)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2 Bb4 6.Bd2 Bd2 7.Nbd2 OO 8.OO c5 9.dc bc 10.Qc2 Nc6 11.Rfd1 Qb6 12.a3 Rab8 13.Rab1 Rfc8 14.e4 e5 15.Qd3 d6 16.Nf1 Nd4 17.Nd4 ed 18.b4 Qc6 19.bc dc 20.Rb7 Qb7 21.e5 Qb3 22.ef Qd3 23.Rd3 Rb1 24.Bd5 Rcb8 25.Kg2 R8b3 26.Rb3 Rb3 27.Nd2 (27.a4 nothing working with saving the pawn) Ra3 28.Ne4 a5 29.Nc5 gf 30.Kf1 a4 31.Ke2 Ra1 32.Nd3 (32.Nd7 is the right way) a3 33.c5 a2 34.Kf3 Rd1 35.Ba2 Rd3 36.Ke4 Rd2 37.Bc4 Kf8 38.f3 Rh2 39.Kd4 Ke7 40.Bd3 (40.g4 gives more fight) h5 41.Ke3 Rg2 42.Kf4 Rg1 43.Be4 Rc1 44.c6 Rc3 45.c7 Rc7 46.Bd5 Rc5 47.Ba2 Rb5 48.Ke3 Ra5 49.Bc4 c5 50.Ba6 Ke6 51.Kf4 Rc3 52.Bf1 f5 53.Ba6 Kf6 54.Bb7 Rc4 55.Ke3 Kg5 56.Kf2 f4 57.Kg2 f5 0-1

Friday, June 19, 2009

Game 31

Game 31
Havasi - Capablanca
Budapest 1929

E34 : Nimzo-Indian Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:30:08)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 d5 5.Nf3 c5 6.cd Qd5 7.a3 Bc3 8.bc Nc6 9.e3 OO 10.Be2 cd 11.cd b6 12.Nd2 Bb7 13.Bf3 Qd7 14.OO Rac8 15.Qb1 Na5 16.Bb7 Qb7 17.Bb2 Qa6 18.Re1 Nd5 19.Ra2 Rc6 20.e4 Nc3 21.Bc3 Rc3 22.Nf3 Rfc8 23.h3 (23.d5 is better) c4 24.a4 a3 25.Qb2 Qa4 26.Re2 (26.Rea1 holds) b5 27.d5 ed (27...b4 is more direct) 28.ed b4 29.Qd2 (29.Ra1 is better) b3 30.Rb2 Rc2 31.Qe3 Rb2 32.Rb2 Nc4 33.Qc1 Qa3 34.Rb1 Qc1 0-1

Game 30

Game 30
Capablanca - Villegas
Buenos Aires 1914

D04 : Queen's Pawn Game

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:27:03)

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 c6 4.Bd3 Bg4 5.c4 e6 6.Nbd2 Nbd7 7.OO Be7 8.Qc2 Bh5 9.b3 Bg6 10.Bb2 Bd3 11.Qd3 OO 12.Rae1 Qc7 13.e4 de 14.Ne4 Ne4 15.Re4 Bf6 16.Qe2 c5 17.Ne5 cd 18.Nd7 Qd7 19.Bd4 Bd4 20.Rd4 Qc7 21.Rfd1 Rfd8 22.b4 Rd4 23.Qd4 b6 24.g3 Rc8 25.Rc1 Rd8 26.Qe2 Kf8 27.c5 bc 28.Qe4 Rd5 29.bc g6 30.c6 Kg7 (wasting time. The immediate 30...Rb5 is called for) 31.a4 Rd6 32.Qe5 f6 33.Qd6 Qd6 34.c7 1-0

Game 29

Game 29
Marshall - Tarrasch
Nuremberg Match (1) 1905

D51 : Queen's Gambit Declined

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:30:01)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.Qc2 Qa5 7.cd Nd5 8.Nf3 Bb4 9.Kd2 (Simply bad. 9. Rc1 is enough) c5 10.a3 Bc3 11.bc cd 12.ed N7b6 13.Bd3 Bd7 14.Rhc1 Rc8 15.Qb3 OO 16.Ke2 (Not far enough. 16.Ke1 is called for) Rc3 17.Rc3 Qc3 18.Qb1 h6 19.Bd2 Qc7 20.Kf1 Nc4 21.Bc1 Ba4 22.Qa2 Rc8 23.Qe2 Nc3 24.Qe1 Na5 25.Bh6 Nb3 26.Bd2 Na1 27.Qa1 Bb5 28.Bb5 Nb5 29.g3 Qc6 30.Kg2 Rd8 31.Be2 Qe4 32.Qb2 Rd5 33.a4 Nd6 34.Bf4 Nf5 35.Be2 Ne3 36.fe Qe3 37.g4 f5 38.g5 Qe4 39.Qc3 f4 40.Qc8 Kh7 41.Qc3 e5 42.h4 Rd4 43.g6 Kh6 44.Kh2 Qe2 0-1

Game 27

Game 27
Tarrasch - Mieses
Gothenburg 1920

B01 : Scandinavian Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:22:31)

1.e4 d5 2.ed Qd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.d4 e5 (4...Nf6 is better) 5.Nf3 Bb4 6.Bd2 Bg4 7.Be2 ed 8.Nd4 Qe5 9.Ncb5 Be2 10.Qe2 Bd2 11.Kd2 Qe2 12.Qe2 Na6 13.Rhe1 OOO 14.Na7 Kb8 15.Nac6 bc 16.Nc6 Kc8 17.Nd8 Kd8 18.Rad1 Ke8 (18...Kc8 would avoid lots of trouble) 19.Kd3 Ne7 20.Kc4 h5 21.Rd3 Nb8 22.Rde3 Nbc6 23.b4 f6 24.f4 Kf7 25.a4 Rb8 26.c3 Rd8 27.Rd3 Rd3 28.Kd3 Ke8 29.a5 Kd7 30.a6 Nd5 31.Ra1 Na7 32.g3 c6 33.Ra4 Nb6 34.Ra5 g6 35.c4 Nbc8 36.Ra1 Nd6 37.Kd4 Ndc8 (37...f5 will prolong the fight) 38.Kc5 Kc7 39.Re1 Nb6 40.Re7 Nd7 41.Rd7 1-0

Game 27

Game 27
Chekhover - Rudalovsky
Moscow 1945

D61 : Queen's Gamibt Orthodox Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:27:31)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 OO 6.Nc3 Nbd7 7.Qc2 c6 8.Bd3 dc 9.Bc4 Nd5 10.Be7 Qe7 11.OO b5 (11...N7b6 maintains the equilibrium) 12.Be2 (12.Nd5 wins a pawn) a6 (12...Nc3 is better) 13.Ne4 Bb7 14.Ne5 Rac8 15.Nd7 Qd7 16.c5 Qc7 17.Rfd1 Rcd8 18.Rac1 Bc8 19.Qe4 Nf6 20.Qh4 Qa5 21.a3 b4 22.a4 Nd7 23.b3 Nc5 (23...Nf6 The Knight is needed for kingside support) 24.Rc5 Qb6 25.Rdc1 Bb7 26.a5 Qa7 27.Bd3 g6 28.Qf6 Rd6 (28...Rd5 is called for) 29.Qe7 (29.R1c4 is more immediate) Rfd8 30.h4 R8d7 (30...Qb8 for the much needed back rank support) 31.Qf6 Qa8 32.Be4 Qe8 33.h5 Rd8 (33...Qd8 to take the Queen out) 34.Bc6 Bc6 35.h6 Kf8 (35...Qf8 still somehow holds) 36.Rc6 Rc6 37.Rc6 Rd7 38.Rc8 Qc8 39.Qh8 1-0

Game 26

Game 26
O.Berntein - Mieses
Coburg 1904
B45 : Sicilian Defence Paulsen Variation

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:26:38)

1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.d4 cd 5.Nd4 Nf6 6.Nc6 bc 7.e5 Nd5 8.Ne4 f5 (8...Qc7 is one of the better alternatives) 9.ef Nf6 10.Nd6 Bd6 11.Qd6 Ne4 12.Qd4 Nf6 13.Qd6 Ne4 14.Qb4 d5 15.Bd3 Qd6 (15...Qb6 may be better) 16.Qd6 Nd6 17.f4 (17.Bf4 is better) a5 18.Be3 Ba6 19.Kd2 c4 (19...Bd3 preserves the equality) 20.Bc4 Bc4 21.a4 Kd7 (21...Rb8 is a little better) 22.b3 Ba6 23.Bb6 Bc8 24.Ke3 Ra6 25.Bc5 Kc7 26.Kd4 Bd7 27.Rhe1 h5 28.Re5 g6 29.Rg5 Rg8 (29...Be8 is better) 30. Ke5 Be8 (A little too late. 30...Raa8 is a bit better) 31.Re1 Ra8 32.Kf6 Bd7 33.g3 (good move. 33.Rg6 would be a mistake at this stage) Rae8 34.Ree5 Rh8 35.Rg6 Rh7 36.Rg7 Reh8 37.Rh7 Rh7 38.Kg6 Rh8 39.Kg7 Rd8 40.Rh5 Be8 41.Rh7 Rd7 42.Kh6 Rh7 43.Rh7 Bh5 44.h4 Bd1 45.c3 Bb3 46.g5 Kd7 47.g5 e5 48.f5 Ba4 49.f6 1-0

Game 25

Game 25
Janowsky - Alapin
Barmen 1905
D53 : Queen's Gambit Orthodox Defence
Rybka v2.2n2.w32 (0:27:11)

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.c6 Be7 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 dc 7.e3 a6 8.Bc4 b5 9.Bb3 (9.Bf6 Bf6 10. Bd3 could be slightly better) Nbd7 10.Qe2 c6 11.OO OO 12.Rac1 Bb7 13.Rfd1 Rc8 14.Ne5 Ne5 15.de Nd5 16.Be7 Nc3 17.Rc3 Qe7 18.Rcd3 Rfd8 19.Rd6 Rd6 (19...c5 is better) 20.ed Qd7 21.e4 c5 22.e5 c4 23.Bc2 Qc6 24.f3 Qc5 25.Kh1 Rd8 26.Qe1 Rd7 27.h3 Bc6 28.f4 Ra7 29.f5 Bd7 (29...Rd7 should suffice. The move overlooks a white tactical resource) 30.f6 g6 31.Qg3 Kh7 32.h4 Qc8 33.h5 Qg8 34.Rd4 Be8 35.Rh4 Qf8 36.Rg4 Qg8 37.Qe3 Rd7 38.Rh4 Qf8 39.g4 Kh8 40.hg fg 41.Rh6 Rh7 42.Rh7 Kh7 43. Qg5 Qf7 44.Qh5 Kg8 45.Bg6 Qg6 46.Qg6 1-0

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Game 24
Capablanca - Mattison
Karlsbad 1929

D38 : Nimzo-Indian Defence

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 {00:31:12]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 c5 5.dc Nc6 6.Nf3 Bc5 7.Bf4 d5 8.e3 Qa5 9.Be2 Bb4 10.OO Bc3 11.bc OO 12.Rab1 Qa3 13.Rfd1 b6 14.cd Nd5 15.Ng5 f5 (15...g6 keeps Black's game still playable) 16.Bf3 Qc5 17.c4 Ndb4 (17...Nf4 is better though Black is still losing) 18.Qb3 e5 19.a3 a6 20.Bc6 1-0
Game 23
Van Vliet vs Znosko-Borovsky
Ostend 1907
Stonewall Attack

Rybka v2.2n2.w32 {??:??:??]

D04 : Queen's Pawn Game

1.d4 d5 2.e3 c5 3.c3 e6 4.Bd3 Nc6 5.f4 Nf6 6.Nd2 Qc7 7.Ngf3 cd 8.cd Nb4 9.Bb1 Bd7 10.a3 Rc8 11.OO (11...ab gives more counterchances) Bb5 12.Re1 Nc2 13.Bc2 Qc2 14.Qc2 Rc2 15.h3 Bd6 16.Nb1 (16...b3 is better) Ne4 17.Nfd2 Bd3 18.Ne4 Be4 19.Nd2 Kd7 (19...Bd3 is probably better, though Black is already almost winning) 20.Ne4 de 21.Rb1 (21.Kf1 is better) Rhc8 22.b4 (22.Kf1 is still called for) R8c3 23.Kf1 (23.Rf1 now gives more counterchances on the kingside) Kc6 (23...g5 uncovers a tactical possibility) 24.Bb2 Rb3 25.Re2 Re2 26.Ke2 Kb5 27.Kd2 Ka4 28.Ke2 a5 29.Kf2 ab 30.ab ab 31.Ke2 Kb5 32.Kd2 Ba3 33.Kc2 Rb2 34.Rb2 Bb2 35.Kb2 Kc4 36.Kc2 b5 0-1

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Game 22

Game 22
Pillsbury - Marco
Paris 1900
Queen's Gambit Declined
[ Rybka v2.2n2.w32 - 00:35:32]
D55: Queen's Gambit Orthodox Defence
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 OO 6.Nf3 b6 7.Bd3 (7.cd is preferable) Bb7 8.cd ed 9.Ne5 Nbd7 10.f4 c5 11.OO c4 (11...cd is better) 12.Bc2 a6 (12...h6 preserves equality) 13.Qf3 b5 14.Qh3 g6 15.f5 b4 (simply bad. 15...Ne5 gives a fighting chance) 16.fg hg 17.Qh4 bc 18.Nd7 Qd7 19.Rf6 a5 20.Raf1 Ra6 21.Bg6 fg 22.Rf8 1-0

Sunday, June 7, 2009

Game 21

Game 21

Chernev - Hahlbohm
New York - 1942
Colle System

[ Rybka v2.2n2.w32 - 00:28:37]

D05: Queen's Pawn Game

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 e6 3.e3 c5 4.c3 Nf6 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.OO OO 8.Qe2 Re8 9.dc Bc5 10.e4 e5 (10...Nd7 is better) 11.ed Nd5 12.Nb3 (12.Ne4 is better) Qb6 (12...Bb6 is better) 13.Bh7 Kh7 14.Qe4 Kg8 15.Qd5 Bf8 (15...Be7 is better) 16.Ng5 Be6 (a blunder. 16...Nd8 is the way to go.) 17.Qe4 g6 18.Qh4 Bg7 19.Be3 Qa6 (19...Qc7 should keep black still in the game, though this is still not enough to equalise) 20.Nc5 Qc4 21.Qh7 Kf8 22.Ne6 fe 23.Qg6 Nd8 24.Nh7 1-0

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Game 20

Game 20

Rubinstein - Salwe
Lodz 1908
Queen's Gambit Declined

[ Rybka v2.2n2.w32 - 00:21:52]

D33: Queen's Gambit Tarrasch Defence

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cd ed 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.g3 Nc6 7.Bg2 cd 8.Nd4 Qb6 9.Nc6 bc 10.OO Be7 11.Na4 (11.e4 is better) Qb5 12.Be3 OO 13.Rc1 Bg4 14.f3 Be6 15.Bc5 Rfe8 16.Rf2 Nd7 17.Be7 Re7 18.Qd4 Ree8 19.Bf1 Rec8 (19...Qb7 is slightly better) 20.e3 Qb7 21.Nc5 Nc5 22.Rc5 Rc7 (22...Bf5 is slightly better) 23.Rfc2 Qb6 24.b4 a6 25.Ra5 Rb8 (25...Rb7 gives more fighting chance) 26.a3 Ra7 (this loses a pawn) 27.Rc6 Qc6 28.Qa7 Ra8 29.Qc5 Qc7 30.Kf2 h5 31.Be2 g6 32.Qd6 Qc8 33.Rc5 Qb7 34.h5 a5 35.Rc7 Qb8 36.b5 a4 37.b6 Ra5 38.b7 1-0

Friday, June 5, 2009

Game 19

Game 19
Grunfeld - Schenkein
Vienna 1915
Queen's Gambit Declined

[ Rybka v2.2n2.w32]

D30: Queen's Gambit Declined.

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf6 e6 4.e3 Nf6 5.Bd3 Nbd7 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.OO Qc2 8.e4 de 9.Ne4 Ne4 10.Be4 Nf6 11.Bc2 b6 12.Qe2 Bb7 13.Ne5 Rd8 14.Rd1 OO 15.Bf4 Bd6 (15...Qc8 is better) 16.c5 bc 17.dc Be5 (Beginning of the downfall. Surprisingly, Bc5 is better.) 18.Be5 Qa5 (18...Rad1 offers some hope) 19.Bf6 gf 20.Qg4 Kh8 21.Qh4 f5 22.Qe7 Bc8 23.b4 1-0

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Game 18

Game 18
Noteboom – Doesburgh
Netherlands 1931

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

D51: Queen's Gambit Declined: 4 Bg5 Nbd7 sidelines

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.a3 Be7 7.Qc2 0–0 8.Nf3 a6 9.Rd1 Re8 10.Bd3 dxc4 11.Bxc4 b5 12.Bd3 (last book move) 12...h6 13.Bxf6 Nxf6 14.0–0 Bb7 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Bxe4 (Exerts pressure on the backward pawn) 16...f5 17.Bd3 Qb6 [17...Qd6 18.b4=] 18.Rc1 Rac8 19.b4 Qd8 20.Ne5 a5 21.Qb3 Bd6 22.Bxf5 Qf6 23.Bb1 Bxe5 24.dxe5 Qxe5 25.Rc5 a4 26.Qa2 Qd6? [¹26...Qf6±] 27.Qc2+- Rcd8 28.Qh7+ Kf8 [28...Kf7 29.Bg6+ Kf6 30.Bxe8 Rxe8+-] 29.Bg6 1-0

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Game 16

Game 16
Tarrash – Kurschner
Nuremberg 1889

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

D20: Queen's Gambit Accepted: 3 e3 and 3 e4

1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 (last book move) 3...Bf5 4.Bxc4 e6 (Controls d5) 5.Qb3 Be4 6.f3 Bc6 7.Ne2 Nf6 8.e4 Be7 9.Nbc3 Qc8 10.d5 exd5 11.exd5 Bd7 12.d6 Bxd6 13.Bxf7+ Kd8 [13...Ke7 14.Ne4²] 14.Bg5 Nc6 15.Ne4 Be7 [15...h6!? 16.Bxf6+ gxf6±] 16.Bxf6+- gxf6 17.0–0–0 Ne5 18.Nf4 Qb8?? (but even a better move would not have saved the game) [¹18...Bd6 19.Bd5 Rb8 20.Nxf6 b5+-] 19.Qe6 Rf8 [19...c6 a last effort to resist the inevitable 20.Nxf6 Qc7 21.Nxd7 Nxd7+-] 20.Nxf6 Bd6 21.Nxd7 Nxd7 22.Rhe1 1-0

Game 15

Game 15
Alekhine – Poindle
Simultaneous, Vienna 1936

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C67: Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defence: 4 0–0 Nxe4

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0–0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.dxe5 Nxb5 7.a4 Nd6 8.exd6 Bxd6 9.Ng5 (last book move) 9...Be7 10.Qh5 g6 11.Qh6 (White traps the enemy king in the center) 11...Bf8 12.Re1+ Ne7 13.Ne4 f5 14.Nf6+ Kf7 15.Qh4 Bg7? [¹15...d5 and Black hangs on 16.Nxh7 Kg8 17.Nf6+ Kg7²] 16.Bg5+- [16.Nxh7?! Nc6 17.Ng5+ Kf8²] 16...h6 [16...c6 17.Nxh7 Re8 18.Nc3+-] 17.Qc4+ Kf8 [17...d5 does not help much 18.Nxd5!! Theme: Clearance for g5-d8 18...Nxd5 19.Bxd8 Rxd8 20.Nc3+-] 18.Rxe7! (Eliminates the defender e7) 18...Qxe7 (Decoy theme: e7) [18...Kxe7 Decoy to e7 19.Nd5 Discovered attack] 19.Nh7+!! (Clearance to allow g5-e7. Discovered attack) 19...Rxh7 20.Bxe7+ Kxe7 21.Qxc7 [¹21.Qg8 and the rest is a matter of technique 21...b6 22.Qxh7+-] 21...Bxb2 22.Ra2 Bf6 23.c4 Kf7 [23...Ke8 24.Re2+ Re7 25.Rxe7+ Bxe7 26.Nc3+-] 24.Re2 Rh8 25.Qd6 [25.Na3 Rf8 26.Nb5 b6 27.Nd6+ Kg8+-] 25...a5 26.Nc3 Ra6 27.Qd5+ Kg7 28.Nb5 Re6 [28...Rb6+-] 29.Nd6 Rd8 30.Kf1 [30.Rxe6 seems even better 30...dxe6 31.Qc5 Bd7+-] 1-0

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Game 14

Game 14
Tarrasch - Mieses
Berlin 1916

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C10: French with 3 Nc3: Unusual Black 3rd moves and 3...dxe4

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Nf3 Ngf6 6.Bd3 Be7 7.0–0 Nxe4 8.Bxe4 Nf6 9.Bd3 ( last book move) 9...b6 10.Ne5 0–0 [10...Bb7 11.Bb5+ Kf8 12.Bc6 Bxc6 13.Nxc6²] 11.Nc6± Qd6 12.Qf3 Bd7 13.Nxe7+ Qxe7 14.Bg5 Rac8 15.Rfe1 Rfe8 [15...h6 16.Bf4±] 16.Qh3 Qd6?? (the final mistake, not that it matters anymore) [¹16...h5+-] 17.Bxf6 gxf6 18.Qh6 [18.Qxh7+?! is clearly worse 18...Kf8+-] 18...f5 19.Re3 Qxd4 [19...e5 a last effort to resist the inevitable 20.Rg3+ Qg6 21.Rxg6+ hxg6+-] 20.c3 [¹20.Rg3+ and White wins 20...Kh8 21.c3+-] 1-0

Game 13

Game 13
Dobias - Podgorny
Prague 1952

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C10: French with 3 Nc3: Unusual Black 3rd moves and 3...dxe4

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Nf3 Be7 6.Bd3 Ngf6 7.Qe2 0–0 8.0–0 (last book move) 8...Nxe4 9.Qxe4 Nf6 10.Qh4 b6 [10...Re8 11.Re1±] 11.Bg5± g6 12.c4 [12.Be4 Rb8±] 12...Bb7 13.d5 exd5 14.Rfe1 h6 15.Qxh6 Ng4 16.Qh4 [16.Bxe7?! is much weaker 16...Nxh6 17.Bxd8 Rfxd8 18.cxd5 Bxd5=] 16...Bxg5 17.Nxg5 [17.Qxg5?! Qxg5 18.Nxg5 Rfe8 19.cxd5 Bxd5=] 17...Nf6 18.Qh6 d4 [18...Qd7 the only chance to get some counterplay 19.Re3 d4+-] 19.Re6!! (Demolition of pawn structure) 19...Re8 [19...fxe6 Deflection from g6 20.Qxg6] 20.Bxg6! (Demolishes the pawn shield. . . . . . .) 1-0

Game 12

Game 12
Pischak - Flohr
Liebwerda 1934

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

A29: English Opening: Four Knights Variation with 4 g3

1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.Bg2 Nb6 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.0–0 Be7 8.d3 0–0 9.Be3 Bg4 10.h3 (last book move) 10...Bh5 11.Rc1 Qd7 12.Na4 Bxf3 13.Bxf3 Qxh3 14.Bxc6 [14.Nc5 Bxc5 15.Rxc5 Qe6=] 14...bxc6³ 15.Rxc6 [15.Bc5!? looks like a viable alternative 15...Bxc5 16.Nxc5³] 15...Nd5µ 16.Qe1 [16.Bc5 Bxc5 17.Nxc5 Rfb8µ] 16...f5 17.Bc5?? (but even a better move would not have saved the game) [17.Nc3 Nb4 18.Rc4–+] 17...f4 18.Bxe7 [18.Rg6 hxg6 19.Bxe7 Nxe7–+] 18...fxg3 [¹18...Nxe7 keeps an even firmer grip 19.Qc1 fxg3 20.fxg3 Qxg3+ 21.Kh1 Nxc6 22.Nc3 Rxf1+ 23.Qxf1–+] 19.fxg3 Ne3 [19...Ne3 20.Rxf8+ Rxf8–+] 0-1

Game 11

Game 11
Flohr – Pischak
Bilin 1930

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

A47: 1 d4 Nf6 2 Nf3 b6: Torre, London and Colle Systems

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.Nbd2 c5 4.e3 b6 5.Bd3 Bb7 6.0–0 Be7 7.c4 0–0 8.b3 d5 (last book move) 9.Qc2 Nc6 10.a3 (Consolidates b4) [10.Ba3 dxc4 11.bxc4 cxd4 12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13.exd4 Rfd8³] 10...cxd4 11.cxd5 Qxd5 12.exd4 [12.Bc4!? Qd6 13.Bb2µ] 12...Nxd4–+ 13.Qb1 [13.Qc4 Nxf3+ 14.Nxf3 Qh5–+] 13...Rfd8 14.Ne1 Qh5 15.Bb2?? (White falls apart) [15.h3–+] 15...Bd6 16.g3 [16.h3 otherwise it's curtains at once 16...Bxg2! Demolishes the pawn shield 17.Bxh7+ Nxh7 18.Bxd4 Qxh3 19.f4–+] 16...Ng4 17.h4 Qxh4!? [17...Qxh4 18.Nef3 Nxf3+ 19.Nxf3 Bxf3 20.Bxh7+ Kf8 21.Bxg7+ Ke8 22.gxh4 Bh2#] 0-1

Game 10

Game 10
Tarrasch – Eckart
Nuremberg 1889

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C05: French Tarrasch: 3...Nf6 4 e5 Nfd7, 5 f4 and 5 Bd3 sidelines

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.Ne2 Qb6 8.Nf3 Be7 9.0–0 0–0 10.Nf4 (last book move) 10...Nd8 11.Qc2 f5? [11...h6 and Black has air to breath] 12.exf6+- Nxf6 13.Ng5 g6 [13...Ne4 14.Nxe4 dxe4 15.Bxe4 Rf6 16.Bxh7+ Kf7+-] 14.Bxg6! (Demolition of pawn structure) 14...hxg6 [14...Rf7 the last chance for counterplay 15.Nxf7 Nxf7 16.Bxh7+ Kf8 17.Ng6+ Ke8 18.Nxe7 Kxe7 19.dxc5 Qxc5+-] 15.Qxg6+ Kh8 16.Qh6+ Kg8 17.Ng6 1-0

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Game 9

Game 9
Znosko-Borovsky - Mackenzie
Weston-super-Mare 1924

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C90: Closed Ruy Lopez with 7...d6: Early deviations

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0–0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 Na5 9.Bc2 c5 10.d4 Qc7 11.h3 Nc6 12.Be3 0–0 13.Nbd2 (last book move) 13...Bd7 14.Rc1 Ne8 15.Nf1 g6 [15...Nf6!?= has some apparent merit] 16.Bh6± Ng7 17.Ne3 Rae8 18.Nd5 Qb7 19.Nxe7+ Rxe7 20.dxc5 dxc5 21.Qd6 c4 22.Qf6 Nh5 23.Qh4 Ng7 24.Be3 Ne6 [24...Ra8 25.Rcd1±] 25.Qf6 [25.Nxe5!? h5 26.Rcd1+-] 25...Qc7 26.Bh6 Rc8 [26...Rfe8 27.Nh2±] 27.Rcd1+- Ree8 28.Nh2 Qd8? [¹28...Rcd8+-] 29.Ng4 Qe7 [29...Rc7 doesn't get the bull off the ice 30.f4 Qxf6 31.Nxf6+ Kh8 32.f5+- (32.Nxe8?! Bxe8 33.f5 Nc5+-) ] 30.Qxe7 1-0

NOTES:
1. Good point raised by Fritz which was not mentioned in the book. Why not simply 25.Nxe5 instead of 25.Qf6?

Game 8

Game 8
Przepiorka – Prokes
Budapest 1929

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

D05: Colle System with ...e6

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.e3 d5 4.Bd3 c5 5.c3 Nbd7 6.Nbd2 Bd6 7.0–0 0–0 8.Re1 Qc7 9.e4 cxd4 10.cxd4 dxe4 11.Nxe4 (last book move.) 11...b6 12.Bg5 Nxe4 13.Rxe4 Bb7 14.Rc1 Qb8 15.Rh4 g6 16.Bb5 Qe8 [16...f6 17.Bxd7 Bxf3 18.gxf3 fxg5=] 17.Ne5! (and the rest is history) 17...Bc8?? (the pressure is too much, Black crumbles [17...Nxe5 A pinning theme 18.Bxe8]) 18.Rxc8! (Eliminates the defender c8) 18...Qxc8 [18...Rxc8 Decoy theme: c8 19.Bxd7 A double attack] 19.Bxd7 [19.Nxd7 might be the shorter path 19...f6 20.Nxf6+ Rxf6 21.Bxf6 Qf8+-] 19...Qc7 20.Ng4 h5 [20...f5 is one last hope 21.Bxe6+ Kg7+-] 21.Nf6+ Kg7 22.Nxh5+! (Demolishes the pawn shield) 22...gxh5 23.Qxh5 Rh8 [23...Bxh2+ doesn't change the outcome of the game 24.Kh1 Qc1+ 25.Bxc1 Bf4 26.Bxf4 Rfd8 27.Qg5+ Kf8 28.Rh8#] 24.Bh6+ 1-0

Game 7

Game 7
Spielmann – Wahle
Vienna 1926

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C01: French: Exchange Variation

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.exd5 exd5 5.Bg5 Be7 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.Nge2 Nb4 8.Ng3 (last book move) 8...Nxd3+ 9.Qxd3 g6 (Secures f5+h5) [9...0–0 10.0–0=] 10.0–0 c6 (Prevents intrusion on b5) 11.Rae1 0–0 (Black should quickly conclude development.) 12.Rxe7 Qxe7 13.Qf3 Kg7?? (but even a better move would not have saved the game) [13...Bg4 14.Qxf6 Qxf6 15.Bxf6 Rae8±] 14.Nce4 dxe4 [14...Qexe4 (Deflection from f6) 15.Qxf6 (Annihilates a defender: f6)] 15.Nxe4 Qe6 [15...Qxe4 (Theme: Deflection from f6 16.Qxf6)] 16.Bxf6+ [16.Qxf6+?! Qxf6 17.Bxf6+ Kh6²; 16.Nxf6?! h6 (16...Qxa2?? is not directly advisable since it leads to the following attractive mate 17.Ne8+ Rxe8 18.Qf6+ Kg8 19.Bh6 Qxb2 20.Qg7#) 17.d5 Qe5±] 16...Kg8 [16...Qxf6 cannot change what is in store for ? 17.Qxf6+ Kg8 18.Qe5+-] 17.Qf4 1-0

Monday, January 12, 2009

Game 6

Game 6
Zeissl – Walthoffen
Vienna 1899

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C63: Ruy Lopez: Schliemann/Jaenisch Defence

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 4.d4 fxe4 5.Nxe5 Nxe5 6.dxe5 c6 7.Bc4 Qa5+ ( last book move) 8.Nc3 Qxe5 9.0–0 [9.Be3 d5 10.Bd4 Qg5] 9...d5–+ 10.Bb3 Nf6 11.Be3 [11.Ne2 Bg4 12.Qe1 Bxe2 13.Qxe2 Bd6–+] 11...Bd6 12.g3 Bg4 13.Qd2 [13.f4 exf3 14.Qd3–+] 13...Bf3 14.Bf4 [14.Rfb1 no good, but what else? 14...Qf5 15.Kf1–+] 14...Qf5 15.Nd1 [15.Be5 cannot undo what has already been done 15...Qh3 16.Bxd6 Qg2#] 15...Qh3 16.Ne3 Ng4 17.Rfc1 Qxh2+ 18.Kf1 0–1

Game 5

Game 5
Ruger – Gebhard
Dresden 1915

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 (last book move) 7...0–0 8.d5 (White gets more space) [8.Bg5 h6 9.Bxf6 Qxf6] 8...Ne7 [8...Nxe4!? is worth looking at 9.Qc2 Nd6=] 9.e5 Ne4 10.Qc2 Nxc3 11.bxc3 Bc5 12.Ng5 Ng6 13.h4 h6?? (another step towards the grave) [13...b5 14.Bxb5 Re8±] 14.d6!+- (Theme: Clearance for c4-f7) 14...hxg5 [14...Bcxd6 15.Qxg6 A double attack] 15.hxg5 [15.Qxg6 Bd4 16.hxg5 Bxf2+ 17.Kxf2 Qf6+ 18.gxf6 cxd6 19.Qxg7#] 15...Re8 16.Qxg6 Rxe5+ 17.Kf1 [17.Be3 Rxe3+ 18.fxe3 Qe8 19.Qh7+ Kf8 20.Qh8#] 1-0


NOTES:
The book surprisingly missed tactical resource 8...Nxe4!?

Game 4

Game 4
Blackburne – Blanchard
London 1891

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C30: King's Gambit Declined
1.e4 e5 2.f4 Bc5 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.Nf3 (last book move) 4...exf4 5.d4 Bb4 6.Bxf4 d5 7.e5 (White wins space) 7...Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 Be6 9.Bd3 h6 10.0–0 Nge7 11.Rb1 b6 12.Qd2 0–0? [12...Qd7 would allow Black to play on] 13.Bxh6!+- (Demolition of pawn structure) 13...gxh6? [13...Nf5 14.Bg5 Qd7+-] 14.Qxh6 (Decoy to h6) 14...Ng6 [14...Nf5 a last effort to resist the inevitable 15.Bxf5 Bxf5+-] 15.Ng5 Re8 [15...Qxg5 the only chance to get some counterplay 16.Qxg5 Nce7+-] 16.Rxf7!! (Demolition of pawn structure.) 16...Bxf7 17.Qh7+ (Theme: Double Attack) 17...Kf8 18.Qxf7# 1–0

Game 3

Game 3
Colle – Delvaux
Gand-Terneuzen 1929

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

D05: Colle System with ...e6

1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Bd3 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.Nbd2 Be7 7.0–0 (last book move) 7...c4 8.Bc2 b5 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 0–0 [10...Bb7 11.Nxf6+ Bxf6 12.Re1] 11.Qe2 [11.a4 b4±] 11...Bb7 12.Nfg5 h6 [12...g6!? is an interesting idea] 13.Nxf6+± Bxf6 14.Qe4 g6 [14...Re8 15.Qh7+ Kf8 16.Ne4±] 15.Nxe6!+- (Demolishes the pawn shield) 15...fxe6? [15...Nxd4 16.Qxb7 Nxe6 17.Qxb5 Qc7+-] 16.Qxg6+ Bg7 17.Qh7+ [17.Qxe6+?! is clearly worse 17...Rf7 18.Bg6 Qf6 19.Bxf7+ Qxf7 20.Qxf7+ Kxf7±; 17.Bxh6?! is the weaker alternative 17...Qf6 18.Qh7+ Kf7 19.Bxg7 Qxg7 20.Qh5+ Kf6] 17...Kf7 18.Bg6+ [18.Bxh6?! is the less attractive alternative 18...Qf6 19.Bxg7 Qxg7 20.Qh5+ Kf6] 18...Kf6 19.Bh5 [19.Bxh6?! is no comparison 19...Bxh6 20.Be4 Qb6 21.Qxh6+ Ke7] 19...Ne7 [19...Qd5 what else? 20.Qg6+ Ke7 21.Qxg7+ Kd6 22.Qxb7 Qxh5 23.Bf4+ Rxf4 24.Qxa8 Rg4+-] 20.Bxh6 Rg8 [20...Bxh6 does not solve anything 21.Qxh6+ Ng6 22.Qxg6+ Ke7 23.Qg7+ Kd6 24.Qxb7+-] 21.h4 [21.f4 and the result of the game is clear: White will win 21...e5 22.Bxg7+ Rxg7 23.Qh6+ Rg6 24.Bxg6 e4 25.Bh5+ Ng6+-] 21...Bxh6 [21...Qd5 praying for a miracle 22.Bg5+ Qxg5 23.hxg5+ Kxg5 24.f4+ Kf6+-] 22.Qf7# 1–0


NOTES:
Fritz 6 sure nailed this one right.

Game 2

Game 2
Liubarski – Soultanbeieff
Liege 1928

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C53: Giuoco Piano sidelines

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Bb6 5.d4 Qe7 6.0–0 Nf6 7.d5 (last book move) 7...Nb8 8.Bd3 d6 9.h3 (Consolidates g4) 9...h6 10.Qe2 g5 11.Nh2 g4 12.hxg4 Rg8 13.Bxh6?? (allows the opponent back into the game) [13.Nd2= this is the best way to fight back] 13...Nxg4–+ 14.Be3 [14.Bb5+ doesn't get the cat off the tree 14...Kd8 15.Nf3 Nxh6–+] 14...Nxh2 15.Kxh2 [15.Bxb6 is the last straw 15...Qh4 16.g3 Nxf1 17.Qxf1 axb6 18.Nd2–+] 15...Qh4+ 16.Kg1 Qh3 [16...Qh3 17.Bb5+ Nc6 18.g3 Rh8 19.Bxc6+ bxc6 20.f3 Bxe3+ 21.Qxe3 Qxg3#] 0–1

NOTES
1. 9.h3 has been rightly condemned by the author as weakening the kingside castled position. Guess Fritz 6 positional understanding still has some way to go (or maybe default settings need tweaking).
2. I prefer the author’s suggestion of 13.Be3 instead of 13.Nd2.

Game 1

Game 1
von Scheve – Teichmann
Berlin 1907

[Fritz 6 (30s)]

C53: Giuoco Piano sidelines
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Qe7 5.0–0 d6 6.d4 Bb6 7.a4 a6 (last book move) 8.a5 Ba7 [8...Nxa5 9.Bd5=] 9.h3 Nf6 10.dxe5 [10.d5!? should be examined more closely 10...Nb8 11.Nbd2] 10...Nxe5 [Less advisable is 10...Nxe4 11.exd6 cxd6 12.Nbd2 Nxd2 13.Bxd2] 11.Nxe5 Qxe5 [Inferior is 11...dxe5 12.Qf3=] 12.Nd2 [12.Qc2 Bxh3 13.Qd3 Be6 14.Bxe6 fxe6–+] 12...Bxh3! (Demolishes the pawn shield) [12...Nxe4? is nothing because of 13.Nxe4 Be6 14.Qa4+ c6 15.Bxe6 Qxe6 16.Be3 Bxe3 17.Rae1+- (‹17.fxe3 d5 18.Nf2 0–0–0+-) ] 13.gxh3 [13.Bxf7+ Ke7 (13...Kxf7?! 14.Nf3 Qg3 15.Ng5+ Kg6 16.Nxh3) 14.Kh1 Bg4–+ (14...Kxf7?! 15.gxh3 Qe6 16.Kg2) ] 13...Qg3+ 14.Kh1 Qxh3+ 15.Kg1 Ng4 16.Nf3 Qg3+ 17.Kh1 Bxf2 [17...Bxf2 18.Bxf7+ Kf8 (18...Kxf7?! 19.Qd5+ Ke7 20.Bg5+ Kd7 21.Qf5+ Kc6 22.Qd5+ Kd7 23.Qf5+ Kc6 24.Qd5+ Kd7=) ] 0-1


NOTES:
The author seems to missed the strong white tactical resource on move 13 (13.Bxf7) and 18 (18.Bxf7). In both cases, if Black gets greedy and took the Bishop, there will be still lots of struggles left...